Networks and Infrastructure
From immersion in Jeppestown to the capacity analysis of a base building, various themes have formed part of my architectural process and progress, thus far. Networks, beginning with Transient versus Temporary, exploring how people use open, green, public space in conscious and subconscious manners. This translated into Transient Infrastructure, Network Infrastructure (Hard and Soft) and Networks (existing systems). Furthermore, how Stitching Networks through architecture can create place for spaces that are successful for both individuals and higher level orders. Open Building Stitching, examines where Transient/Temporary capacities (relative to the base building) are stitched into an existing building. This theme then cycles around to the first theme, and illustrates how every project builds on its predecessors.
From contexts rooted in Johannesburg, to the hypothetical, each site has presented its own challenges and opportunities. A night in Jeppestown instilled the value of immersion within a context, while a desktop study of Denver highlighted the information that can be gained from a more objective point-of-view. Context, forms an integral part of architectural study – a notion which has been carried through from my first project. While every brief has requirements, every context equally presents its own requirements, which work in conjunction with the themes in the research phase of every project. A particular context of interest, to myself, is Fordsburg. This is due several reasons, most significantly of which is the fine grain nature of the urban fabric which is juxtaposed by the large block of the Oriental Plaza.
Working with every brief, set of themes and context, one develops a response to, and through, this research. Initially responses were more research/exploration based, where I would question ‘Why?’, specifically related around the idea of ‘Transience’ and the related subconscious actions. The next step was a hypothetical/speculative response to infrastructure, wherein the notion of ‘Transience’, evolved into ‘Transient Infrastructure’, still questioning in terms of themes and context, but more related to an infrastructure that integrates into existing networks and temporal systems. This evolution continued into a more holistic analysis and engagement with networks, in several forms.
In response to the context, these networks begin to reveal opportunities for architecture, which is rooted in existing functioning systems.
The progression of projects, and respective outcomes, have encouraged a progression in the process of architecture, rather than the object of architecture. This process was founded on the immersive mapping and understanding of Jeppestown, where I implemented a simple intervention to challenge the ‘subconscious transient users’ of a park. It continued through the proposal of innovative neighbourhood transient infrastructure, then through the stitching of fine grain and large, block grain urban fabric, with response to existing networks - principally a local network of curtain manufacturers.
My semester, and process of architecture, is currently constructed of everything done thus far, inclusion of what was good and the exclusion of what was not - and I believe this leads to a process where the whole is truly greater than the sum of the parts.
